5 lessons healthcare can learn from project management

Author: Dr David Lee, MD

Physicians have traditionally been individual thinkers and doers. Healthcare in general has been generally slow to adopt proven successful methods of processes and technologies employed with success in other sectors of society. Medical training from medical school through post-graduate education has been traditionally focused on the individual.

Hospitals these days are driven by regulatory issues surrounding patient care. In reading about project management (PM), I have noticed that much of what I did as a practicing physician fit into standard PM teaching. However, it helps to frame a discussion around PM today in the context of healthcare, because of how fragmented care delivery is.

1. Collaborative interaction is a key component to success. It fosters constant and open communication, multidirectional input and conflict resolution as it occurs, not when it is too late. Team management of patients is catching on, but not universally practiced. Multidisciplinary hospital rounds including pharmacy, nursing, discharge planning are important to identify patients at high risk of readmissions, improve the relay of consistent and accurate information to the patient and caregivers, improve documentation and indirectly improve patient satisfaction and efficiency.

Collaboration and communication among personnel in the operating room is especially important. According to one study, “communication failures in the OR…occurred in approximately 30 percent of team exchanges and a third of these resulted in effects which jeopardized patient safety by increasing cognitive load, interrupting routine and increasing tension in the OR.” Electronic health records and their interoperability are being implemented to facilitate collaborative interactions among different technologies and providers. There are even intra-office communications problems that have negative outcome implications for patients. There is a long way to go on that front, mostly due to non-technical issues.

2. Planning, execution and management are other important fundamentals of PM. One key to this is the project manager. “Ownership” of the patient from a supervisory standpoint is important. A patient with multiple co-morbidities and chronic diseases (especially in ED and ICU patients) might commonly have multiple physicians and other providers involved in care. Communications among team members in the ICU is important to not only resolve conflicts among ICU team members, but to improve care at the time of discharge from the ICU. Reevaluation of the patient at certain milestones (on admission, important relevant tests, significant change of clinical status, pre-discharge, etc.) with the entire team is important for clinical decision-making, communications to family members and transfer of the patient to an outside facility.

3. Sharing a vision is paramount in any team project. Goal alignment and vision as well as support from the managers all constitute part of the foundation for ongoing good morale and thus execution. If the hospital, physician and others have different visions, the patient will not be receiving the best possible care. I always surprised people by saying that my biggest decisions were based on what would benefit the patient. They were invariably the right decisions.

4. Technology today plays a role in all project management; however it is never a solution. Project management uses technology as tools in projecting costs, keeping track of personnel, timeline milestones, efficiency and budgets. Hospitals and providers are using more and more technology to collect, analyze and reference information. Technology in all instances needs to be considered and used as a tool and not a solution. Though the implantation of a pacemaker might be a solution to a patient’s problem, the monitoring of that device wirelessly for evaluation of device system function and the patient’s arrhythmia status are tools to support that solution. Good medical apps are potential tools that can be used for reference, patient self-monitoring and disease management. They do not serve as a substitute for a physician or other healthcare provider.

5. Costs matter. Hospitals and others are looking more at costs and less at the revenue side of budget planning. Bundled payments, decreasing reimbursements and the dissolution of fee-for-service models have all driven this shift. The purchase of medical equipment and devices has seen a drastic shift in processes as well as players. Project management preaches minimizing scope creep (which invariably raises costs). In the same vein, healthcare must minimize cost creep. Doing so might mean examining some (less clinically impactful and more regulatory-laden) provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

I did not intend to give a seminar in PM, but merely to frame a discussion around the idea that healthcare changes can come about without fundamental changes. Some are accomplished with institution of principles of PM, and some require cultural shifts in education, roles of providers, relative emphasis of technology and, most importantly, with the patient, who should be at the center of all major healthcare PM decisions.

David Lee Scher is a former cardiac electrophysiologist and is an independent consultant and owner/director at DLS Healthcare Consulting, LLC, concentrating in advising digital health companies and their partnering institutions, providers and businesses. A pioneer adopter of remote cardiac monitoring, he lectures worldwide promoting the benefits of digital health technologies. Twitter: @dlschermd. He also blogs at http://davidleescher.com. He was cited as one of the 10 cardiologists to follow on Twitter and one of the top 10 blogs on healthcare technology.

Recent Posts

  • Researchers at the Technion–Israel Institute of Technology have developed a glue gun to put the human body back together when it has been seriously injured. The pins and stitches currently used to treat serious injuries come with drawbacks: They can be painful, they leave scars, they require high skill from the doctor, and they sometimes have to be removed after the tissues heal. Suture on the intestine, lungs or blood vessels often leak and therefore require a sealant. The medical glue that the researchers have developed is a “two in one,” said Prof. Boaz Mizrahi, head of the Biomaterials Laboratory of the Technion. It replaces both stitches and the sealant, and is good for both external and internal injuries, he said. All sorts of medical glues are already being used in dermatology, surgery, and other areas. Israeli startup Nanomedic Technologies Ltd., for example, has developed a medical device that it says can dress burns and other wounds with nano materials that mimic human tissue and peel off once the skin below is regenerated. Still, the glues currently in use to replace sutures and staples are limited by their mechanical properties and toxicity, the researchers said. Because they are very toxic, they can be utilized only on the surface of the skin. In addition, hardening of the glue may make the organ less flexible or the adhesion may not be sufficiently strong. With these limitations in mind, researchers have been on the hunt for a glue that is suitable for different tissues, nontoxic, and flexible after hardening. Such a glue would also need to decompose in the body after the tissue is fused together. Mizrahi worked together with doctoral student Alona Shagan and came up with what they say is a “very strong, nontoxic tissue adhesive that remains flexible even after solidification.” Their study...
  • Pinnacle Ventures has launched a pharmacogenomics programme to enable genetic testing to drive personalised prescribing decisions. The innovation arm of Pinnacle Midlands Health Network, a not-for-profit primary health care management company in New Zealand, is also working on embedding biomarker information into electronic health records and linking it to a clinical-decision support prescribing tool that can help prescribers by providing direct access to international pathways and guidelines. Pharmacogenetics involves prescriptions being tailored to a person’s genetic make-up, as people metabolise drugs in different ways, which can have a significant impact on a drug’s effectiveness. Ventures plans to do about 5,000 pharmacogenetic tests over the next 12 months, says chief executive John Macaskill-Smith. Some will be self-funded because individuals are struggling with their medications and others will be fully funded by Ventures, targeting specific groups within the Midlands population. Macaskill-Smith says it is a simple test that covers 65–70 per cent of medications frequently prescribed in New Zealand. “The New Zealand health system is under strain but using testing like this you could reduce the trial and error of prescribing and prevent adverse reactions to medications,” he said. Ethnicity plays a big part in how a person metabolises drugs, but the clinical trials that prescribing information are based on very rarely involve Māori or Pasifika test subjects. Macaskill-Smith said Ventures is partnering with key kiwi groups, Auckland University and Otago University medical schools and Callaghan Innovation to support research and develop a better understanding of how unique New Zealand populations respond to different medications. People who have a pharmacogenetic test can choose to consent to contributing their non-identifiable demographic information to researchers. Embedding the biomarker information into EHRs ensures a patient’s results are used for both current and future prescribing decisions, he said. Macaskill-Smith says a lot of direct-to-consumer online genetic-testing tools involve people...
  • Surgery students spend so much time on screens that they have lost the ability to perform simple tasks such as stitching and sewing up patients, a professor has warned. Roger Kneebone, a professor of surgical education at Imperial College, London, says the focus on academic knowledge has come at the expense of craftsmanship. “It is important and an increasingly urgent issue,” Kneebone told the BBC. “It is a concern of mine and my scientific colleagues that whereas in the past you could make the assumption that students would leave school able to do certain practical things – cutting things out, making things – that is no longer the case.” The professor, who teaches surgery to medical students, believes that this is down to an increase in technology which takes away the experience of handling materials and developing skills. ”An obvious example is of a surgeon needing some dexterity and skill in sewing or stitching,” he explained. ”A lot of things are reduced to swiping on a two-dimensional flat screen” Kneebone adds that a growing number of students are becoming “less competent and less confident” in using their hands, resulting in young professionals who “have very high exam grades but lack tactile general knowledge”. The professor will be speaking on Tuesday at the V&A Museum of Childhood in east London, at the launch of a report, published by the Edge Foundation, calling for more creativity in the curriculum. The report warns that entries to creative subjects have fallen by 20 per cent since 2010, including a 57 per cent fall in design and technology GCSE. Tristram Hunt, director of the Victoria and Albert Museum, who will be speaking alongside Professor Kneebone added: “Creativity is not just for artists. “Subjects like design and technology, music, art and drama are vitally important for...